The Marathi film ‘Court’ directed
by Sri. Chaitanya Tamhane, won the National Award for Best Feature Film of the
year 2014. The said film, which has received several international accolades,
raises a lot of profound issues and deserves a lot of discussion and
deliberation.
The film has a Kafkaesque plot,
bearing a lot of semblance to that of Franz Kafka’s celebrated work ‘The
Trial’, wherein the protagonist Josef K had to stand an absurd and labyrinthine
trial, without being informed at all about the crime for which he was being
prosecuted. The film also adopts the device of an absurdist plot, often invoked
in literary works to signify the random, meaningless and nihilistic
vicissitudes of life.
The protagonist is a senior
citizen, Narayan Kamble, who is a dalit-activisit, poet and folk-singer, and
gets prosecuted for abetment of suicide.
The allegations is that a sewer-cleaner
suffocated himself to death in an underground sewer, and that the same was a
suicide, which was instigated by a song performance by Narayan Kamble which
lamented that the sewer-cleaners and manual scavengers had no right to life in
this country. The prosecution is on the strength of certain anachronistic
provisions of law like, Section 306 of Indian Penal Code which makes abetment
to suicide an offence, and the Dramatic Performances Act 1876. The possession
of certain literary works by Narayan Kamble, which were banned during the
British regime, is used as an evidence to portray Narayan Kamble as an
anarchist and extremist.
The prosecution story is as
absurd as it sounds, and defies common sense and logic. Law is, however, not
always compatible with common sense, and often defies logic, which made Charles
Dickens to comment long ago that ‘Law is an ass’. That which appears as absurd
to common sense, might transform as jurisprudential doctrines in law. What is
discarded as puerile and non-sense by the prudent man on the street, might seem
as legal conundrums to a jurist. Strange, is the course of law, and the film
marvelously conveys that point.
Anyways, the Court conducts the
trial of Narayan Kamble very seriously, reminiscent of the instance of Dr.
Binayak Sen, who was prosecuted for sedition for possessing Maoist literature.
The trial makes no deviation from the consistent pattern of history from time
immemorial, which has always persecuted those who speak out inconvenient
truths.
Apart from being a satire on the
perfunctory and absurdist ways of the legal process, the film is a brilliant
depiction of the innumerable paradoxes present in the human self. The defense
lawyer of Narayan Kamble, Vinay Vora, hails from a rich and elite background.
He puts in all sincere efforts to save Kamble, and fancies himself as a protector
of human rights. While not arguing in courts, he gives talks on human rights
before upper-class intellectual audiences( ‘five-star activists’, to borrow the
usage of PM Modi), frequents plush pubs and restaurants, enjoys premium wines
and jazz music, and sinks himself into mindless TV programmes at late night. A
loner at heart addicted to luxuries of life, Vinay Vora gives out the
impression of a person who is doing things to fill in the void of his inner
life, and he is a beneficiary of the neo-liberal policies and consumerism,
against which Narayan Kamble had been fighting throughout his life.
Whereas, the lady prosecutor
Nutan, who goes about her job with the sort of nonchalance characteristic to a
government employee, is a middle-class wife, who travels in second class local
train compartments and worries about price rise of cooking oil. As a typical middle class woman, who is struggling
to make both ends to meet, and to balance the interests of work a family, she
is in a better position to identify and empathize with the ideals of Narayan
Kamble. However, she is trapped within the confines of her humble life, and
does not endeavor to look beyond its limited horizons. For her, the case of
Narayan Kamble is yet another headache, and she wants to get done with it at
the earliest by sending him to prison.
The judge in this movie is the
personification of apathy and indifference. It is true that a judge should be
dispassionate. However, if the judge goes about his business mechanically,
without opening his eyes, and without understanding the essence of law, the
results would be absurd and dangerous, as pointed out by the film.
Be that as it may, Narayan Kamble
gets ultimately acquitted for want of evidence. However, he is immediately
brought before the same court on a different allegation that he committed
sedition by writing anti-national poems. The Court was closing for long summer
recess, and the judge, in his haste to wind up things fast, refuses to hear his
bail plea, and with utmost apathy directs him to approach the High Court during
vacation. What follows is a long still shot of the dark and empty court room,
after the staff has switched off the lights and shut the doors, and the scene
is powerful enough to fill darkness in the hearts of any sensitive viewer.
All of us are thrown into life
situations which were beyond our choice, and we all confine ourselves to such
situations, sleep-walking through our lives without caring to understand or
discern the ultimate truth, and to experience the essence of life. We all
believe our half-truths to be eternally and universally valid, and that often
results in inflicting of punishment on others and ourselves. Such grand
philosophical insights glitter here and
there in the film, without getting preachy. Here, the only person to grasp the
real truth was Narayan Kamble and he gets punished due to the ignorance and
apathy of others. And the others make a prison for themselves with their
half-baked lives, and wallow in self-pity and agony therein.
The film closes with the scenes
of the judge indulging in vacation revelry. Without any prick of heart
regarding the suffering caused to others due to his dereliction of duty, the
judge enjoys himself in a beach resort. Clad in a tee-shirt and bermuda, he
sings to anthakshari games, drowns in liquor and gets jealous about young IIM
graduates landing lucrative jobs with lakhs per month as pay, gives unsolicited
advise on numerology and gem stones etc. Upon getting exhausted in his vacation
revelry, the Judge dozes off in a bench, and a bunch of kids play a prank on
him by screaming at him. The Judge wakes up from his slumber, with a stunned
expression, and the film ends with that scene. Was it the director’s call to
the audience to wake up from the slumber of life, and to feel the essence of
life and grasp the truth? Yes, the truth might stun us; but it will also
liberate us. The brilliant film, portrays reality as it is without taking any
artistic liberties, and turns our faces to a lot of inconvenient truths.
Hi Manu! I have followed your writings on livelaw for sometime now.
ReplyDeleteI find that you are inherently an excellent reviewer and choreographer of the law related developments.
I am struck for an answer to this. Is there a way that these works of yours could be brought in contention to the common audience who are today forced to consume only the unworthy information available today in mainstream .
The gap between the two is so deep that presently its requiring a monstrous effort and nerdy passion for a non-law layman (me) to dig out authentic information on state of the nation and my thirst is only half quenched despite your concise and reader friendly expression language.
Seriously I am craving to get involved but am deserted with no where to go or start at
i am wise, intelligent and inwardly honest. i can be creative, resourceful and participate in your work without being burden, as a volunteer. I have ground grasp over law news and uncanny ability to critically comment over political excesses. Being a non-law, I desparately need a platform where i can be heard by both the professional community and general public as weel. please advise.
ReplyDelete